But the big banks are more lending focused then they used to be. And they have much more capital than they used to to absorb loan losses, which was really a big problem in the financial crisis. Critics of the act have said the bill has stifled economic growth and has been ineffective. President Donald Trump was critical of the act during his presidential campaign. In an interview in October , Trump said, "Dodd-Frank has made it impossible for bankers to function.
It makes it very hard for bankers to loan money for people to create jobs, for people with businesses to create jobs. And that has to stop. The House Financial Services Committee approved the bill , with all Democrats and one Republican on the committee opposing the act. On February 3, , President Donald Trump signed an executive order soliciting recommendations from heads of regulatory agencies on parts of the Dodd-Frank Act to change.
The bill passed by the House repeals about 40 provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The bill allows banks to not be subject to the heightened regulatory requirements of Dodd-Frank by maintaining a ratio of capital over borrowed money to withstand a financial downturn.
The bill also repeals the Volcker Rule, a rule which prevents commercial banks from making speculative investments for their own profits. Ballotpedia features , encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers.
Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error. Click here to contact us for media inquiries, and please donate here to support our continued expansion. Share this page Follow Ballotpedia. What's on your ballot? Jump to: navigation , search.
The Dodd-Frank Act established about new financial regulations. File:PPS File:Governor Tarullo Tarullo, a member of the Board of Governors of the U. File:Paul A. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Securities and Exchange Commission , "H. Categories : Pages with broken file links Finance policy laws and lawsuits Federal issues, financial regulations Federal finance policy laws.
Voter information What's on my ballot? Where do I vote? How do I register to vote? In addition, many mortgage lenders and mortgage brokers were almost completely unregulated. Too many responsible American families have paid the price for an outdated regulatory system that failed to adequately oversee payday lenders, credit card companies, mortgage lenders, and others, allowing them to take advantage of consumers.
Like a neighborhood cop on the beat, the CFPB supervises banks, credit unions, and other financial companies, and will enforce federal consumer financial laws. For example:. The CFPB has launched a program called Know Before You Owe , an effort to combine two federally required mortgage disclosures into a single, simpler form that makes the costs and risks of the loan clear and allows consumers to comparison shop.
For the first time, there is ongoing federal oversight of both nonbank companies and banks in the mortgage market to protect borrowers from unfair, deceptive or other illegal mortgage lending practices. For families caught by unexpected overdraft fees: Many households have been automatically enrolled in expensive overdraft programs.
These programs can hit consumers with costly overdraft fees for even the smallest purchases. The CFPB will enforce new rules that give consumers a real choice as to whether to join expensive overdraft programs so that they are not unknowingly charged unnecessary fees. Dodd-Frank delegated, largely to the Federal Reserve, the important task of how to set the scales to achieve this balancing act. Congress is changing the weights on the scale, and is empowering the Fed even more, but it is continues the Dodd-Frank structure.
This is the argument put forth by many in Congress and within the banking industry. The new tax law and this new bank de-regulation law will continue to help boost profits, what trickles down in lending is less clear. The mobile home provision does not even touch banks, big or small. Mobile home buyers will have less visibility into true costs, making it harder to shop for the best deal.
An argument that boils down to the extra profit generated by steering consumers to products not allowed under Truth-In-Lending, may produce more marginal mobile home purchases, is weak. The second provision targets banks that originate between and mortgages a year, exempting them from collecting enhanced data used to detect predatory and racially discriminatory mortgage lending. Those banks originate only around one out of seven mortgages and are competing with other national mortgage lenders who are subject to this data-reporting requirement.
In the scope of a nationally competitive mortgage origination business, with far greater costs and inefficiencies than this additional data, it is hard to see how any savings will translate to borrowers, or how additional mortgages will be made.
However, it could allow for greater undetected steering of minorities to higher cost mortgages — which was prevalent during the housing boom — as well as create more false positives where traditional information show discrimination but enhanced data would demonstrate otherwise.
These two provisions are both bad policy and unlikely to spur greater overall lending. Instead, they are likely to generate higher profits for the providers of credit and potentially worse terms for borrowers.
Previously, I covered personal finance at other national web publications including Bankrate and The Penny Hoarder. When I'm not digging up the best ways to manage your money, I'm out traveling the world. Follow me on Twitter at keywordkelly. Select Region. United States. United Kingdom. Kelly Anne Smith. Forbes Advisor Staff. Editorial Note: Forbes Advisor may earn a commission on sales made from partner links on this page, but that doesn't affect our editors' opinions or evaluations.
Getty Images. Was this article helpful? Share your feedback. Send feedback to the editorial team. Rate this Article. Thank You for your feedback! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Best Ofs. More from. By Kat Tretina Contributor. Information provided on Forbes Advisor is for educational purposes only. Your financial situation is unique and the products and services we review may not be right for your circumstances. We do not offer financial advice, advisory or brokerage services, nor do we recommend or advise individuals or to buy or sell particular stocks or securities.
Performance information may have changed since the time of publication.
0コメント